DIGC 202: Facebook and Twitter are just places revolutionaries go

The main purpose of the invention of Facebook and Twitter was simple as socializing and networking at first but as time goes, these two media platforms can do something far away from our imagination. These media platform were originally created for entertainment or socializing purposes but users these days have discover the new usage of these media such as organizing a protest. Many revolutionaries have used these two media platform as their media to spread the news, gathering purposes and organizing a protest.

Regarding to the incident happens in the Middle East, Cyber Utopians believed that the reason behind the protest in Arab Spring was  driven by social networks. According to Morozov (2011), he mentioned that there were many more events like this happened not just in Cairo, but also in Beirut and Dubai. He added that the idea that the recent protests ( referring to Tahrir Square protest) were organised by random people doing random things online. From this case, I believes that these media platform can be very influential to the people and it an bring a big impact in changing a human’s behavior or believes. Besides that, Morozov also stated that internet equals to democracy. I could not be more agree with him after the incident of Bersih 3.0 was conducted in my very own country.

Bersih 3.0 was one of the biggest protest ever conducted in Malaysia. Supporters are shifting their media coverage for their information from word of mouth to these two big media platform, Facebook and Twitter.

As you can see from the image Bersih 3.0 twitter account has 3000 over followers and Facebook has 45 068 subscribers that were keeping track on their updates and news. People know media platform such a Facebook and Twitter can reached out to a mass audiences compared to many other media therefore revolutionaries knew that with the help of these two platforms, they can easily access or reach out to all the supporters or for the recruitment. However, it can also cause a big problem with some small matters. I believes that these two media platform can do much more and I believe is harmless to come out something like that. In my opinion, I believes that Facebook and Twitter can become a big help to any protest but I do not agrees that these social networking site should took the blame for causing a protest. After all, these events have been long existed even before these social networking sites were invented therefore I do believe that revolutionaries access to these media platform for their own usage but these media platforms have never encourage these protests to happen.

Morozov, E 2011, Facebook and Twitter are just places revolutionaries go, accessed 28/10/2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/07/facebook-twitter-revolutionaries-cyber-utopians


About lucasleehn

I'm a student from University of Wollongong and I'm currently major in Marketing Communication and Advertising.

3 responses to “DIGC 202: Facebook and Twitter are just places revolutionaries go”

  1. ChristyL says :

    Protests and riots exist long before Facebook and Twitter came into the picture. Yet, there was no incident that was quite as severe that it could end the reigns of the any ruling government. Social media made it possible to organize revolutions on a large scale, however, it isn’t social media that caused the change, the people of the country did. Social media is merely a tool to communicate with a widespread audience.

  2. rozzy13 says :

    If we look back through history, we will find that no one dared mention about political revolution. Back when there were only newspapers and news broadcasters who are partially controlled by the government, most countries are at peace in terms that freedom of speech was not able to be exercised. But with the aid of the social networks, voices are starting to be sprung up among the usually quiet younger generation – where politics are concerned.

  3. aryssafahmy says :

    When it comes to Arab Spring and social media, I somehow find it a bad combination. For the social media doesn’t have any age limit and it lets younger generation to join this kind of protest which to me isn’t a good idea. Yes, even before social media wasn’t famous as it is now, young kids still join the protest. But what I am stating here is that, social media will increase younger generation to participate in the protest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: